API Wars

As technology evolves, software copyright laws become fuzzy and open to interpretation. This year we’ll see the Supreme Court review the legal status of a copyright dispute related to Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) between Oracle and Google. Previously the ruling was in favour of Oracle, who accused Google of infringing the copyright of the Java API, for its reimplementation in the Android OS.

An API is “a set of functions and procedures allowing the creation of applications that access the features or data of an operating system, application, or other service”. In other words, APIs are about creating interaction and connecting things that were not previously connected. Successful APIs foster fruitful communities which bring the underlying technology one step further, by creating useful derived works or by (re)implementing it in novel ways. Most software companies try to make their products more open and easy to integrate and use with other products. This usually increases the adoption rate, the overall popularity, and appreciation for the product. This type of openness is meant to build bridges between companies and encourage partnerships.

At the end of the day, we all want to make money. Whereas some are in the business of building bridges others seem to profit more by building walls. The world is divided like that. Being all alone and surrounded by high walls can make you vulnerable to scrutiny. As a consequence of their own actions, Oracle is now accused of copying Amazon’s S3 API. Of course, different shades of grey come to light when you find yourself accused of a crime you previously reported. Oracle has argued that using an API is not related to reimplementation disqualifying it as an infringement of copyright.

API copyright wars could create a legal minefield of gotchas. This generates confusion and spreads fear amongst consumers. Sure, you should always ask for permission to use an API, but giving companies monopoly power over the competition by means of copyright law defies the purpose of the law itself. Let us not forget that these laws are made to protect the creator from abuse and not to empower the creator to abuse.

Posted in ,

Licenseware

W22-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

By Alex Cojocaru | June 6, 2024 | Comments Off on W22-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

W19-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

By Alex Cojocaru | May 14, 2024 | Comments Off on W19-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

Red Hat Middleware Licensing White Paper

By Licenseware | May 8, 2024 | Comments Off on Red Hat Middleware Licensing White Paper

Red Hat Enterprise Linux OS Licensing White Paper

By Licenseware | May 8, 2024 | Comments Off on Red Hat Enterprise Linux OS Licensing White Paper

Licenseware Partners with ICE Information Technology to Expand into the Middle East

By Licenseware | April 16, 2024 | Comments Off on Licenseware Partners with ICE Information Technology to Expand into the Middle East

W15-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

By Alex Cojocaru | April 16, 2024 | Comments Off on W15-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

5 Reasons You Need the Lansweeper + Licenseware Integration Bundle

By Licenseware | April 9, 2024 | Comments Off on 5 Reasons You Need the Lansweeper + Licenseware Integration Bundle

Be More Efficient with a SAM Bundle from Lansweeper & Licenseware

By Licenseware | April 8, 2024 | Comments Off on Be More Efficient with a SAM Bundle from Lansweeper & Licenseware

Understanding the ROI of SAM: How Lansweeper and Licenseware Deliver Value while Slashing Costs

By Licenseware | April 5, 2024 | Comments Off on Understanding the ROI of SAM: How Lansweeper and Licenseware Deliver Value while Slashing Costs

W13-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

By Alex Cojocaru | April 1, 2024 | Comments Off on W13-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs